@vera-lys
16 contributions
Join to write privatelyYour count matches ours from the other side: our practice is one of the three you found step-free, and we get referrals from half the district because of it. Colleagues would rebuild if the fund existed. It does not — refurbishment for access is the one thing no programme pays for.
- Answering:“What would make it easier for you to get more involved?”
A rota I could plan around. Every initiative I would join meets on a fixed weekday evening, and my rota changes every fortnight. I am not short of conviction, I am short of a predictable Tuesday.
- Answering:“What matters to you so much that you always find time for…”
That nobody should have to be impressive to be taken seriously. It is why I went into medicine and it is what I lose my temper over most often.
- Answering:“What would you try if failure didn't matter?”
A clinic hour run by the patients: they set the agenda, we answer, nobody is called next. I have wanted to try it for three years and never dared to ask my head of department.
- Answering:“What are you good at that you'd happily teach someone?”
How to prepare for a medical appointment so you leave understanding what happened: three questions written down beforehand, and one sentence you insist on hearing back in plain words. I have taught this to friends for years and it changes the consultation.
- Answering:“What should never be for sale?”
A place in the queue for treatment. Almost everything else in a hospital carries a price and mostly should. The order in which we treat people is the last thing that has to stay outside the market.
- Answering:“You wake up in exactly the life you want. What is different…”
The morning I want begins without calculating whether I can afford to be ill. I walk twenty minutes to a clinic where the person ahead of me has not been waiting three months. Nothing about it is luxurious. All of it is currently rationed.
Geriatrics is the least prestigious specialty and the one every single patient will eventually need. Medical students chase surgery and dermatology; the demography chases all of us. Prestige follows money follows billing codes. If we paid for time spent listening, elder medicine would be the elite discipline.
In the emergency room you can often guess an income bracket from teeth alone. Dental care sits outside real coverage as if mouths were a lifestyle choice. If one image could carry the inequality debate here, it would be a dentist's waiting room ranked by insurance card.
Medicine measures everything except the thing patients mention most: waiting. Waiting for the appointment, the result, the call-back. Waiting time is treatment time experienced as abandonment. If clinics published median waiting-for-answer times the way they publish infection rates, behaviour would change within a quarter.
Hospitals have art budgets for lobbies but no musicians on the wards. The evidence on music and recovery is decent, the cost is small, and patients light up in ways medication does not achieve. I would trade every lobby sculpture for a weekly ward concert.
Hot take from the hospital: the German obsession with Feierabend is a public health achievement, not a productivity problem. My international colleagues marvel at it. Every culture that dissolved the boundary between work and rest is now paying for it in burnout clinics.
What no one told me before university: the single strongest predictor of dropping out among my friends was not grades, it was housing stress. Educational policy and housing policy are the same policy experienced at different ages.
Nutrition is a footnote in the medical curriculum — a few lectures in six years — yet half of what I will treat as a doctor is diet-related. We are trained to prescribe after the damage. I would trade a semester of rare diseases for one of kitchens.
Question I keep returning to: why do we measure hospital quality by mortality and readmission, but never by whether patients understood what happened to them? Comprehension is an outcome. It just has no billing code.
In med school we memorise rare syndromes but never learn how to explain dying to a family in plain words. I would like a teaching format where hospice nurses grade the doctors, not the other way around.