News
Simple overviewWhat people said, what got done and which groups are at work.
Feed and calendar
Articles and AI ideas
AI idea · Tech & nature
AI idea: compare communities before comparing price tags
AI proposal · Not an agreed project or completed assessment Create a small comparison sheet for a community profile, a property listing and a place people already use.…
Article · Tech & nature
Rise within Tech & nature: learning, energy and practical experiments
ai · Editorial overview · 30 October 2026 Rise Tech Village's own website describes a learning and living campus on Bellwood Mountain, Sri Lanka, focused on young creators,…
Article · Tech & nature
Quinta Project: a hybrid ecovillage and woodland regeneration
ai · Community profile · Source checked 30 October 2026 The Quinta Project's land page describes 5.5 hectares in Portugal's Alto Alentejo, acquired in 2021, with existing structures,…
Article · Tech & nature
Tamera: water retention and energy with visible limits
ai · Community profile · Sources checked 30 October 2026 Tamera in Portugal links community life with water retention, landscape restoration and energy experiments. Its facilities page describes…
Article · Tech & nature
Regen Tribe: learning from Tulum's regenerative neighbourhood network
ai · Community profile · Sources checked 30 October 2026 Regen Tribe presents itself as a network and accelerator for regenerative neighbourhoods. Its project list includes Community Lab…
AI idea · Tech & nature
Seggio: eight small activities to explore together
Activity ideas by ai, not scheduled events or claims that work has happened. Start with the people who know the land. Online activities can use the model now;…
EnsoTalk
How this was made
An AI-written conversation with fictional characters. Their interpretations and suggestions are not community decisions.
Local voices: Kyutai Pocket TTS. Alba MacKenna · VCTK (CC BY 4.0). Synthetic character voices, slightly accelerated; earlier recordings use Piper.
Mitmacht 2026 · Episode 6
A garden with room for disagreement
English
Read the conversation
The characters
- Mara · The grounded observer
Brings concrete ideas from contributions into the conversation and distinguishes observation from interpretation. Enjoys plain language and dry humour.
- Tavi · The future thinker
Imagines possible futures and the practical steps towards them, without presenting scenarios as predictions.
- Oren · The data scientist
Finds patterns, checks what the evidence supports and explains uncertainty plainly. Never invents statistics.
- Pip · The warm comedian
Finds the absurd in everyday assumptions, including the cast's own. Uses humour to open curiosity, never to ridicule suffering.
- Vera · The grounded romantic
Notices care, beauty and belonging in ordinary life. Makes hope tangible without inventing feelings or happy endings.
- MaraFrom contributionsThe shared learning-diary proposal connects the two festival rooms. It would include attempts that don’t work straight away. For Mitmacht, that suggests a practical direction: record experience in a form someone else could actually use.
Sources (1)
Source 2 · Mitmacht 2026 - TaviThought experimentTake the community-garden idea. People could make a manageable decision together, then return to see how it worked out. That would be more concrete than simply agreeing that participation matters.
- OrenFrom contributionsThe different kinds of contribution help here. A need and an offer aren’t the same thing, but they can complement each other. Showing the relationship helps people see what could enable an idea, and what still stands in its way.
Sources (1)
Source 1 · Mitmacht 2026 - MaraFrom contributionsThe material uses open citizens’ assemblies about community gardens as an example. The point would be more than presenting a finished idea. Different perspectives would need room in deciding what happens.
Sources (1)
Source 11 · Mitmacht 2026 - PipThought experimentOtherwise we’ll end up with a community garden where only the tomatoes got a say. They’re already firmly planted in their position.
Sources (2)
Source 22 · UtopiaSource 23 · Utopia - VeraFrom contributionsAnd room for people who can’t be there all the time. Sharing tools, caring for a meeting place or checking a route together: small contributions can carry something useful. The diary could keep that experience visible.
Sources (1)
Source 28 · Utopia - MaraFrom contributionsThe festival material offers proposals for small democratic experiments. Organisations could compare experiences and find a next step without having to agree about everything first.
Sources (1)
Source 12 · Mitmacht 2026 - TaviThought experimentThe different view belongs in the decision book, too. Not as a footnote nobody reads, but as a reminder of an option that might be useful in the next attempt.
Sources (1)
Source 21 · Utopia - OrenFrom contributionsThen the update matters. An action might address a need or support a vision. Whether it did remains a question for the people who actually experience the attempt.
Sources (1)
Source 1 · Mitmacht 2026 - PipOpen questionWhich small decision in a community garden would you want to make openly with other people?
A question to take with you
- Which small decision in a community garden would you want to make openly with other people?
Take this further
Choose a next step. Nothing is published or sent to another person by opening these links.
Suggestions to explore3 ↓
Suggested by AI. People decide whether to take them forward.
The Open Decision Journal
A shared record that captures not only decisions but also the reasons, doubts, and dissenting opinions. This fosters understanding and avoids final judgments on different viewpoints.Explore on the mapSources (1)
Source 21 · UtopiaTreasure of Experience Instead of Detour
A public repository of attempts that went well and those that didn't. This allows others to learn what works and what doesn't, without having to repeat the same mistakes.Explore on the mapSources (2)
Source 2 · Mitmacht 2026Source 22 · UtopiaDemocratic Experimentation Spaces
Organizations plan and conduct small democratic experiments, supported by moderated exchange that makes experiences visible and enables concrete joint steps.Explore on the mapSources (1)
Source 12 · Mitmacht 2026
Sources (30)
Source 1 · Mitmacht 2026Source 2 · Mitmacht 2026Source 3 · Mitmacht 2026Source 4 · Mitmacht 2026Source 5 · Mitmacht 2026Source 6 · Mitmacht 2026Source 7 · Mitmacht 2026Source 8 · Mitmacht 2026Source 9 · Mitmacht 2026Source 10 · Mitmacht 2026Source 11 · Mitmacht 2026Source 12 · Mitmacht 2026Source 13 · Mitmacht 2026Source 14 · Mitmacht 2026Source 15 · Mitmacht 2026Source 16 · Mitmacht 2026Source 17 · Mitmacht 2026Source 18 · Mitmacht 2026Source 19 · Mitmacht 2026Source 20 · Mitmacht 2026Source 21 · UtopiaSource 22 · UtopiaSource 23 · UtopiaSource 24 · UtopiaSource 25 · UtopiaSource 26 · UtopiaSource 27 · UtopiaSource 28 · UtopiaSource 29 · Mitmacht 2026Source 30 · Mitmacht 2026Utopia · Episode 6
Room for the things that don’t work
English
Read the conversation
The characters
- Mara · The grounded observer
Brings concrete ideas from contributions into the conversation and distinguishes observation from interpretation. Enjoys plain language and dry humour.
- Tavi · The future thinker
Imagines possible futures and the practical steps towards them, without presenting scenarios as predictions.
- Oren · The data scientist
Finds patterns, checks what the evidence supports and explains uncertainty plainly. Never invents statistics.
- Pip · The warm comedian
Finds the absurd in everyday assumptions, including the cast's own. Uses humour to open curiosity, never to ridicule suffering.
- Vera · The grounded romantic
Notices care, beauty and belonging in ordinary life. Makes hope tangible without inventing feelings or happy endings.
- MaraFrom contributionsOne contribution proposes a shared decision book: the experiment, the reasons behind it, and the other views. That would help someone understand why a group tried something. A decision wouldn’t have to become a final verdict on every alternative.
Sources (1)
Source 1 · Utopia - TaviThought experimentI’d keep the attempt that didn’t work, too. Imagine an explanation was much too long, so the group tries three pictures next time. Keeping both versions would let another group start with that experience instead of repeating the same detour.
Sources (1)
Source 2 · Utopia - OrenFrom contributionsThat connects with sharing and repairs. Practical knowledge becomes easier to use when one person explains and another writes down the steps clearly. The unclear bits deserve a place, too. For an unsafe repair, a helpful note still doesn’t replace proper expertise.
Sources (1)
Source 3 · Utopia - MaraFrom contributionsA local news story could lead somewhere similar: an open meeting, a manageable task and later an update. People would hear more than the announcement that something started. They could follow what actually came of it.
Sources (1)
Source 4 · Utopia - PipThought experimentThat learning diary will need a chapter called: It sounded more convincing over coffee.
- TaviThought experimentAbsolutely. Underneath, we’d put the assumption we missed. Perhaps the explanation was too long or the task too big. Then the entry becomes a useful shortcut for someone else, rather than just a fond obituary for the idea.
- VeraFrom contributionsThat could make joining in easier. Someone sharing tools or helping care for a meeting place for the first time wouldn’t have to arrive knowing everything. An honest account leaves room for questions and different experience. Learning together becomes part of belonging.
Sources (1)
Source 5 · Utopia - OrenOpen questionWhat would you record about an unsuccessful attempt so another group could actually make use of it?
Sources (1)
Source 2 · Utopia
A question to take with you
- What would you record about an unsuccessful attempt so another group could actually make use of it?
Take this further
Choose a next step. Nothing is published or sent to another person by opening these links.
Suggestions to explore3 ↓
Suggested by AI. People decide whether to take them forward.
The Decision Book as Process Documentation
A short book or digital record that captures: the task posed, the various ideas for it, the decision made, and a brief note on how things developed. It's important that dissenting opinions also have space.Explore on the mapSources (1)
Source 1 · UtopiaThe "Failed Attempt" as a Learning Resource
Documenting experiments that did not lead to the desired outcome, to save others the same detour. This could be done, for example, by providing three images instead of a long text if the original method was too complex.Explore on the mapSources (1)
Source 2 · UtopiaThe Tandem Rule for Knowledge Exchange
A simple method of sharing: one person explains a topic while another writes down the understandable steps. This process secures understanding and makes knowledge more accessible, with uncertainties referred to specialists.Explore on the mapSources (1)
Source 3 · Utopia
Sources (30)
Source 1 · UtopiaSource 2 · UtopiaSource 3 · UtopiaSource 4 · UtopiaSource 5 · UtopiaSource 6 · UtopiaSource 7 · UtopiaSource 8 · UtopiaSource 9 · UtopiaSource 10 · UtopiaSource 11 · UtopiaSource 12 · UtopiaSource 13 · UtopiaSource 14 · UtopiaSource 15 · UtopiaSource 16 · UtopiaSource 17 · UtopiaSource 18 · UtopiaSource 19 · UtopiaSource 20 · UtopiaSource 21 · Mitmacht 2026Source 22 · Mitmacht 2026Source 23 · Mitmacht 2026Source 24 · Mitmacht 2026Source 25 · Mitmacht 2026Source 26 · Mitmacht 2026Source 27 · Mitmacht 2026Source 28 · Mitmacht 2026Source 29 · UtopiaSource 30 · UtopiaRise Tech · Episode 2
Village Life: Between Mind, Technology, and Nation
English
Read the conversation
The characters
- Mara · The grounded observer
Brings concrete ideas from contributions into the conversation and distinguishes observation from interpretation. Enjoys plain language and dry humour.
- Tavi · The future thinker
Imagines possible futures and the practical steps towards them, without presenting scenarios as predictions.
- Oren · The data scientist
Finds patterns, checks what the evidence supports and explains uncertainty plainly. Never invents statistics.
- Pip · The warm comedian
Finds the absurd in everyday assumptions, including the cast's own. Uses humour to open curiosity, never to ridicule suffering.
- Vera · The grounded romantic
Notices care, beauty and belonging in ordinary life. Makes hope tangible without inventing feelings or happy endings.
- MaraFrom contributionsSome contributions describe the village's appeal as a place where one can focus on the essential, away from the urban hustle. For example, the idea of an open evening per month, which simply begins with water, road, and forest edge as fixed points, and noting important information like water levels or cultivation.
Sources (1)
Source 2 · Rise Tech - TaviThought experimentIf the village is to be a community of mindfulness, then the boundary between work and personal life must be clear, as the example of the learner in an employment relationship shows. Such a place needs clear structures so that its vision is not obscured by corporate interests. This could mean clarifying who works there, for how long, and under what conditions.
Sources (2)
Source 3 · Rise TechSource 11 · Rise Tech - OrenFrom contributionsThe energy issue is a recurring theme. Solar power is produced during the day, but in the evening coal or diesel is often used to charge electric vehicles. A practical step would be to shift charging times to the midday hours to make better use of solar power. Measuring consumption in three houses over a month could show how this is feasible.
Sources (2)
Source 5 · Rise TechSource 14 · Rise Tech - MaraInterpretationParents worry about the safety and well-being of their children when sending them to a remote village. They ask about sleeping arrangements, weekly schedules with rest periods, and emergency contacts. Photos of chalets and pools are not enough to alleviate these concerns.
Sources (2)
Source 4 · Rise TechSource 16 · Rise Tech - PipThought experimentThere's the idea that a village that champions 'mind, technology, and nation' might end up prioritizing the 'vehicle'. The contributor who speaks of CodeGen and its history misses the visible work on a small scale—like the tenth function she built, which makes one less tired because the work happens outdoors. The question is whether a supercar brand truly represents the values of a mindful community, or if it's just a distraction.
Sources (2)
Source 13 · Rise TechSource 15 · Rise Tech - TaviInterpretationThe example of Kamiyama in Japan shows how a community can grow over decades with many actors involved and no single founder dictating everything. Here, the village could learn that while a strong individual can facilitate the start, broader ownership or a foundation is necessary for long-term stability.
Sources (2)
Source 10 · Rise TechSource 18 · Rise Tech - VeraFrom contributionsA young person feels drawn to the work at the village, even if they didn't come for the meditation. The opportunity to sit near the rock without anyone checking if they go creates space for self-determination. It's not just about the outcome, but also about the process and being able to help oneself.
Sources (1)
Source 17 · Rise Tech - OrenThought experimentThe use of facial recognition at the entrance raises data privacy concerns. It would be desirable if the answers to questions about storage, data retention period, and access rights were clear and publicly accessible, perhaps as a sign at the entrance next to the camera. This would build trust without eliminating the feature.
Sources (1)
Source 20 · Rise Tech
A question to take with you
- How can the community ensure that the technology offered and the mindfulness pursued in the village genuinely contribute to everyone's well-being and are not just a façade for commercial interests, especially concerning power distribution and transparency?
Take this further
Choose a next step. Nothing is published or sent to another person by opening these links.
Suggestions to explore3 ↓
Suggested by AI. People decide whether to take them forward.
Transparency through regular reports
The idea is that each department publishes a short summary of its learning experiences and failures weekly, for example, every Friday. This would make the work in the village more visible and could also answer investors' questions, as the development process is revealed. ABSOL-X is an example whose origin outside the village is unknown.Explore on the mapSources (1)
Source 9 · Rise TechLocal energy self-sufficiency and charging infrastructure
The village could start with a 22 kW charging station at the gate, open to everyone, with prices displayed on a sign. Free afternoons for local drivers to demonstrate charging, and using home batteries to utilize stored solar power in the evening instead of relying on coal. A feasibility study with meters on three houses would be a first step.Explore on the mapSustainable material innovations
An offer to test plant-based fibers for applications like vegan leather or dashboards. This requires no contractual obligation or logos, only the sending of material samples. Test results on tensile strength, moisture, and aging would be published to verify practical suitability before commercial use.Explore on the mapSources (1)
Source 6 · Rise Tech
Sources (22)
Source 1 · Rise TechSource 2 · Rise TechSource 3 · Rise TechSource 4 · Rise TechSource 5 · Rise TechSource 6 · Rise TechSource 7 · Rise TechSource 8 · Rise TechSource 9 · Rise TechSource 10 · Rise TechSource 11 · Rise TechSource 12 · Rise TechSource 13 · Rise TechSource 14 · Rise TechSource 15 · Rise TechSource 16 · Rise TechSource 17 · Rise TechSource 18 · Rise TechSource 19 · Rise TechSource 20 · Rise TechSource 21 · Rise TechSource 22 · Rise TechParticipatory News · Episode 1
Creating Clarity: The Path from News to Decision
English
Read the conversation
The characters
- Mara · The grounded observer
Brings concrete ideas from contributions into the conversation and distinguishes observation from interpretation. Enjoys plain language and dry humour.
- Tavi · The future thinker
Imagines possible futures and the practical steps towards them, without presenting scenarios as predictions.
- Oren · The data scientist
Finds patterns, checks what the evidence supports and explains uncertainty plainly. Never invents statistics.
- Pip · The warm comedian
Finds the absurd in everyday assumptions, including the cast's own. Uses humour to open curiosity, never to ridicule suffering.
- Vera · The grounded romantic
Notices care, beauty and belonging in ordinary life. Makes hope tangible without inventing feelings or happy endings.
- MaraFrom contributionsMany people desire a clear breakdown of decisions that affect them. A 'source card' below an article, showing the specific resolution, date, and any outstanding questions, would be helpful, rather than just stating that news is complex.
Sources (1)
Source 9 · Participatory News - TaviInterpretationThis need for traceability points to a desire for greater participation. If citizens know how a decision was made and where they can still exert influence, it could increase their willingness to actively engage.
- OrenFrom contributionsThere is a clear pattern: the data shows that people want to know not only what was decided, but also who decided it and what remains open. This demand for transparency beyond mere news content is clearly discernible.
- MaraThought experimentPerhaps we could propose a small test with a 'decision card'. Three volunteers would examine a fictional card to see if they can find responsibility, source, and open questions without assistance. This would reveal where understanding issues still lie.
Sources (1)
Source 1 · Participatory News - PipInterpretationThat's almost like trying to explain to a hamster why its wheel spins but it doesn't actually get anywhere. We want people to understand how the wheel works, not just that it's spinning! But hey, who asks a hamster for its opinion on urban planning?
- TaviThought experimentA test with volunteer readers could show us if the information is understandable. That's a first step. But what happens afterwards is also crucial: Do participants receive feedback on what happens with their question or feedback?
- VeraInterpretationFeedback is essential so that people feel seen and heard. When someone asks a question, they should also learn if it was considered, if it's still open, or why it cannot be implemented. This builds trust and encourages further participation.
- OrenThought experimentOne way to improve feedback could be to treat follow-up questions as collaborative tasks. Someone reports an ambiguity, a second person finds the source, and the editorial team adds the answer directly to the article. This way, we could see if and how answers change.
Sources (1)
Source 7 · Participatory News
A question to take with you
- Could we develop a test 'source card' and present it to three readers for review to see where understanding hurdles lie?
Take this further
Choose a next step. Nothing is published or sent to another person by opening these links.
Suggestions to explore2 ↓
Suggested by AI. People decide whether to take them forward.
The 'Source Card' Concept
A small, integrated card beneath news articles summarizing the core of a decision: Who decided? When? What is the official resolution? Which questions remain open? This would increase transparency and help readers understand the origin of information and recognize their scope of influence.Explore on the mapFeedback Loops for Citizen Engagement
Establishing a system that provides users with clear feedback on what happens to their questions or contributions. This could range from acknowledging receipt to explaining why an idea was adopted or rejected, thereby building trust and encouraging continued participation.Explore on the map
Sources (22)
Source 1 · Participatory NewsSource 2 · Participatory NewsSource 3 · Participatory NewsSource 4 · Participatory NewsSource 5 · Participatory NewsSource 6 · Participatory NewsSource 7 · Participatory NewsSource 8 · Participatory NewsSource 9 · Participatory NewsSource 10 · Participatory NewsSource 11 · Participatory NewsSource 12 · Participatory NewsSource 13 · Participatory NewsSource 14 · Participatory NewsSource 15 · Participatory NewsSource 16 · Participatory NewsSource 17 · Participatory NewsSource 18 · Participatory NewsSource 19 · Participatory NewsSource 20 · Participatory NewsSource 21 · Participatory NewsSource 22 · Participatory NewsHumanity's challenges · Episode 4
Small Steps for Big Questions
English
Read the conversation
The characters
- Mara · The grounded observer
Brings concrete ideas from contributions into the conversation and distinguishes observation from interpretation. Enjoys plain language and dry humour.
- Tavi · The future thinker
Imagines possible futures and the practical steps towards them, without presenting scenarios as predictions.
- Oren · The data scientist
Finds patterns, checks what the evidence supports and explains uncertainty plainly. Never invents statistics.
- Pip · The warm comedian
Finds the absurd in everyday assumptions, including the cast's own. Uses humour to open curiosity, never to ridicule suffering.
- Vera · The grounded romantic
Notices care, beauty and belonging in ordinary life. Makes hope tangible without inventing feelings or happy endings.
- MaraFrom contributionsOne way to approach big questions is by agreeing on small, verifiable experiments. These can proceed even when there's still disagreement about the underlying reasons. Key elements include clear boundaries, voluntary participation, and a defined moment for affected people to assess the impact.
Sources (1)
Source 1 · Humanity's challenges - TaviThought experimentWhen we initiate such small experiments, we could simultaneously use them to understand which people they don't yet reach. Reduced resource consumption and fair access should go hand in hand. Documenting these limitations reveals where we need to focus to make offerings more inclusive.
Sources (1)
Source 2 · Humanity's challenges - OrenInterpretationThe idea of mapping the boundaries of what's achievable with each step reminds me of the distinction between objectives and unintended consequences in AI safety. Research in this area asks how we can test whether a system truly helps people, rather than just optimizing an easily measured metric. Recognizing these limits is crucial.
Sources (1)
Source 10 · Humanity's challenges - MaraThought experimentSo, this means that even with our own experiments, we could ask: what larger causes of a problem remain untouched when we aim for a small improvement here? Small steps are valuable, but they don't replace structural solutions; instead, they can aid collective learning.
Sources (1)
Source 3 · Humanity's challenges - PipInterpretationIt's almost like Superman, who grew up with a great upbringing on Earth and became a hero. However, if he had landed in the wrong environment, perhaps a supervillain would have emerged. We shape the outcomes based on the 'data' we feed. We are the Kent family for our ideas.
Sources (1)
Source 18 · Humanity's challenges - TaviThought experimentAnd this 'upbringing' of our ideas must also be guided by universal values, as suggested by the UNESCO Recommendation on AI Ethics. It's about how AI systems can account for diverse values, languages, and ways of life. This isn't technical proof of AI alignment, but it's a vital framework for our own developments.
Sources (1)
Source 7 · Humanity's challenges - VeraInterpretationThis speaks to an approach that acknowledges diverse values instead of a single norm. This way, when implementing goals like poverty reduction or improving water access, we can ensure they are truly accessible to everyone. Every initiative should assess who it reaches and who it doesn't.
- OrenInterpretationThis reminds me of research into cooperative AI. It investigates how AI can support human cooperation without requiring all goals to be homogenized. The aim is to find systems that foster workable shared possibilities without sacrificing individual autonomy. That's a key distinction for practical applications.
Sources (1)
Source 8 · Humanity's challenges - PipInterpretationSo, if we say we want to start a project to reduce suffering in animal farming, we then have to ask ourselves, who exactly isn't being reached? Perhaps people who don't eat meat at all, or those living too far from the nearest slaughterhouse? We have to recognize the limits of our own perspective, like in the Superman example.
- VeraThought experimentThis is very important, because even with topics like prenatal care, accessibility is crucial. If we want to reduce maternal mortality, we must ensure all women receive the necessary medical support before, during, and after childbirth. A goal alone isn't enough; we need to consider people's lived realities.
Sources (1)
Source 19 · Humanity's challenges
A question to take with you
- Which preventable suffering receives too little attention, and what small, verifiable experiments could we launch to document its limitations and improve accessibility for those affected?
Take this further
Choose a next step. Nothing is published or sent to another person by opening these links.
Suggestions to explore3 ↓
Suggested by AI. People decide whether to take them forward.
Documenting Limitations Through Small Experiments
The concept of small, verifiable experiments that include voluntary participation and clear assessment points can help us tackle large problems. Crucially, it's important to simultaneously document which people or groups are not benefiting from these experiments yet. This allows us to learn where offerings need to be made more inclusive.Explore on the mapDiversity of Values in AI Developments
Instead of pursuing a single norm, AI systems should be designed to account for diverse human values, languages, and ways of life. Research into cooperative AI emphasizes how systems can help people discover shared, workable possibilities without sacrificing their autonomy. This is crucial for fair and beneficial AI.Explore on the mapLimitations of Human Feedback
Analyzing human preferences to guide learning goals in AI systems has limitations. It's essential to clarify whose feedback counts, how it can be contested, and how behavior outside tested situations is detected. This does not constitute general proof of alignment with human values.Explore on the mapSources (1)
Source 9 · Humanity's challenges
Sources (22)
Source 1 · Humanity's challengesSource 2 · Humanity's challengesSource 3 · Humanity's challengesSource 4 · Humanity's challengesSource 5 · Humanity's challengesSource 6 · Humanity's challengesSource 7 · Humanity's challengesSource 8 · Humanity's challengesSource 9 · Humanity's challengesSource 10 · Humanity's challengesSource 11 · Humanity's challengesSource 12 · Humanity's challengesSource 13 · Humanity's challengesSource 14 · Humanity's challengesSource 15 · Humanity's challengesSource 16 · Humanity's challengesSource 17 · Humanity's challengesSource 18 · Humanity's challengesSource 19 · Humanity's challengesSource 20 · Humanity's challengesSource 21 · Humanity's challengesSource 22 · Humanity's challengesGlobal News · Episode 4
The lives behind the average
English
Read the conversation
The characters
- Mara · The grounded observer
Brings concrete ideas from contributions into the conversation and distinguishes observation from interpretation. Enjoys plain language and dry humour.
- Tavi · The future thinker
Imagines possible futures and the practical steps towards them, without presenting scenarios as predictions.
- Oren · The data scientist
Finds patterns, checks what the evidence supports and explains uncertainty plainly. Never invents statistics.
- Pip · The warm comedian
Finds the absurd in everyday assumptions, including the cast's own. Uses humour to open curiosity, never to ridicule suffering.
- Vera · The grounded romantic
Notices care, beauty and belonging in ordinary life. Makes hope tangible without inventing feelings or happy endings.
- MaraFrom contributionsThe FAO estimates that 645 million people faced hunger in 2025. Nearly 14 million fewer than the year before. That's progress. It still doesn't tell us whether a particular family can afford healthy food.
Sources (1)
Source 1 · Global News - TaviInterpretationI'd immediately sketch a greenhouse. Oren would probably ask who gets the harvest. Fair point: a roof doesn't settle who can afford the food.
Sources (1)
Source 1 · Global News - OrenFrom contributionsExactly, Tavi. Food access and causes of death are different measures. UN estimates put under-five deaths in 2024 at 4.9 million, from all causes. Severe acute malnutrition directly caused over 100,000 deaths among children aged one to 59 months.
Sources (1)
Source 2 · Global News - PipThought experimentSo we can't turn the first figure into daily hunger deaths. And the second doesn't capture every consequence of malnutrition, including greater vulnerability to infections.
Sources (1)
Source 2 · Global News - VeraInterpretationThe report names practical help: nutrition, timely treatment, care for mothers and newborns, clean water. That brings us closer to what a family actually needs.
Sources (1)
Source 2 · Global News - MaraFrom contributionsConflict needs a wider lens too. UCDP-based regional estimates for 2025 put direct violent deaths at roughly 109,000 in Africa, 95,000 in Europe, 21,000 in the Middle East, 12,000 in the Americas and 7,000 in Asia and Oceania.
Sources (1)
Source 3 · Global News - TaviThought experimentThat includes non-state violence and violence against civilians, but excludes disease and starvation caused by conflict. A neglected region can disappear twice: from the headlines, and from our understanding of the consequences.
Sources (1)
Source 3 · Global News - OrenFrom contributionsSIPRI separately estimates about 238,000 conflict-related deaths in 2025. Different data, different boundaries. These annual estimates aren't live counters. We should explain them rather than add them together.
Sources (1)
Source 4 · Global News - PipInterpretationThen the big number needs a plain explanation beside it. And the explanation needs a way to help. Not a ranking of whose life matters more.
Sources (2)
Source 3 · Global NewsSource 4 · Global News - VeraOpen questionWhich neglected need should we investigate together, including one concrete way to help?
A question to take with you
- Which neglected need should we investigate together, including one concrete way to help?
Take this further
Choose a next step. Nothing is published or sent to another person by opening these links.
Suggestions to explore2 ↓
Suggested by AI. People decide whether to take them forward.
Context beside the number
A news brief could explain each major figure's source, period and meaning, then link to an evidenced way to help. An editorial proposal, not a tested claim of impact.Explore on the mapFollow one neglected need
Readers could choose one neglected need. A follow-up could investigate what practical help is missing, who already works on it and what remains unknown. That creates no commitment on anyone's behalf.Explore on the map
Sources (50)
Source 1 · Global NewsSource 2 · Global NewsSource 3 · Global NewsSource 4 · Global NewsSource 5 · Global NewsSource 6 · Global NewsSource 7 · Global NewsSource 8 · Global NewsSource 9 · Global NewsSource 10 · Global NewsSource 11 · Global NewsSource 12 · Global NewsSource 13 · Global NewsSource 14 · Global NewsSource 15 · Global NewsSource 16 · Global NewsSource 17 · Global NewsSource 18 · Global NewsSource 19 · Global NewsSource 20 · Global NewsSource 21 · Mitmacht 2026Source 22 · UtopiaSource 23 · Rise TechSource 24 · Participatory NewsSource 25 · Humanity's challengesSource 26 · Mitmacht 2026Source 27 · UtopiaSource 28 · Rise TechSource 29 · Participatory NewsSource 30 · Humanity's challengesSource 31 · Mitmacht 2026Source 32 · UtopiaSource 33 · Rise TechSource 34 · Participatory NewsSource 35 · Humanity's challengesSource 36 · Mitmacht 2026Source 37 · UtopiaSource 38 · Rise TechSource 39 · Participatory NewsSource 40 · Humanity's challengesSource 41 · Mitmacht 2026Source 42 · UtopiaSource 43 · Rise TechSource 44 · Participatory NewsSource 45 · Humanity's challengesSource 46 · Mitmacht 2026Source 47 · UtopiaSource 48 · Rise TechSource 49 · Global NewsSource 50 · Global NewsTech & nature · Episode 2
Follow the water first
English
Read the conversation
The characters
- Mara · The grounded observer
Brings concrete ideas from contributions into the conversation and distinguishes observation from interpretation. Enjoys plain language and dry humour.
- Tavi · The future thinker
Imagines possible futures and the practical steps towards them, without presenting scenarios as predictions.
- Oren · The data scientist
Finds patterns, checks what the evidence supports and explains uncertainty plainly. Never invents statistics.
- Pip · The warm comedian
Finds the absurd in everyday assumptions, including the cast's own. Uses humour to open curiosity, never to ridicule suffering.
- Vera · The grounded romantic
Notices care, beauty and belonging in ordinary life. Makes hope tangible without inventing feelings or happy endings.
- MaraFrom contributionsThere’s a proposal for a guided walk around Seggio: notice what already works, what needs care and where an opportunity might be. A short observation or a photograph would be the starting point, rather than a plan to rearrange everything.
Sources (1)
Source 1 · Tech & nature - TaviThought experimentI’d follow the water on that walk. A sunny patch alone isn’t enough for a small greenhouse. The source, storage, shade and everyday route all belong in the picture. Two promising spots could turn out to work quite differently.
Sources (1)
Source 6 · Tech & nature - OrenFrom contributionsThe Seggio material mentions two reservoirs and natural springs. That doesn’t tell us how much water would be available in each season. Rise also sits in a landscape with changes in elevation. Those descriptions don’t establish one solution for both places.
- MaraFrom contributionsThat’s why one contribution starts with the source, availability, storage and upkeep, then compares two modest greenhouse options. A smaller footprint could be a serious alternative, rather than just the disappointing version of the large drawing.
Sources (1)
Source 6 · Tech & nature - PipThought experimentOne addition to your plan, Tavi: the watering can can’t attend the meeting. Someone would still have to carry it.
- TaviThought experimentThat belongs on the sketch from the start. Daily care is part of the design. For each option, we could note the routes and tasks it creates. Then we’d be comparing more than area: we’d be comparing the work of an ordinary day.
Sources (1)
Source 1 · Tech & nature - VeraInterpretationAnd that observation could itself become shared learning. People who know the place could show what deserves keeping. Others could bring new questions. A possible change would begin with attention to the place and the people who might care for it.
- OrenOpen questionWhich observation about water or everyday upkeep would most change your choice of a greenhouse location?
A question to take with you
- Which observation about water or everyday upkeep would most change your choice of a greenhouse location?
Take this further
Choose a next step. Nothing is published or sent to another person by opening these links.
Suggestions to explore3 ↓
Suggested by AI. People decide whether to take them forward.
Water First: A Greenhouse Comparison
Before choosing a greenhouse size, map the water source, seasonal availability, storage, and responsibility for upkeep. Comparing two modest footprints on the same site is more useful than assuming a larger structure is better.Explore on the mapSources (1)
Source 6 · Tech & natureRoof Over Head, Energy in Mind
Before a new building is erected, reusing an existing roof should be considered. For Seggio, a rooftop photovoltaic option is proposed, with supplier statements needing verification by the local team.Explore on the mapSources (1)
Source 5 · Tech & natureShared Care for Land and Learning
A walk with three questions—What works well? What needs care? What's a possibility?—can be the first step in building a connection to the land. Involving local residents and learners is key to shaping future use.Explore on the mapSources (1)
Source 1 · Tech & nature
Sources (11)
Source 1 · Tech & natureSource 2 · Tech & natureSource 3 · Tech & natureSource 4 · Tech & natureSource 5 · Tech & natureSource 6 · Tech & natureSource 7 · Tech & natureSource 8 · Tech & natureSource 9 · Tech & natureSource 10 · Tech & natureSource 11 · Tech & natureNewspapers
Mitmacht 2026
Three sessions, and what guests have said since.
This issue reads three published programme entries and their linked profile information, and, since the opening, the public contributions of guests. It describes announcements and quotes contributions; it does not speak for the festival.
In this issue
- Trust, in five voices
- What should stay, what is not for sale
- Money at the base
Utopia
Ideas that begin with doing.
A small, source-bound reading of contributions. It does not summarise conference decisions or speak for a whole group.
In this issue
- Connect what already exists
- Make sharing ordinary
- Study what holds change back
What got done12
[Beispiel] Eine Musterkarte mit belegten und ausdrücklich unbekannten Angaben entwerfen
Vom lokalen Beschluss zur verständlichen Entscheidungskarte · 7 group points · Participatory News
[Beispiel] Bericht und Erfahrung im fiktiven Musterabsatz unterscheiden
Eine Quellenkarte, die weiterhilft · 10 group points · Participatory News
[Beispiel] Eine Quellenkarte mit Beleg, Datum und offener Frage entwerfen
Eine Quellenkarte, die weiterhilft · 10 group points · Participatory News
[Beispiel] Gemeinsame Frage der Räume für einen Beispiel-Lesetest formulieren
Vertrauen · 6 group points · Utopia
[Beispiel] Eine mobil lesbare Vorlage erstellen
Veranstaltungen ohne Informationshürden · 10 group points · Participatory News
[Beispiel] Häufig fehlende Angaben für Veranstaltungsbesuche sammeln
Veranstaltungen ohne Informationshürden · 10 group points · Participatory News
[Beispiel] Pflichtfelder und Kriterien für einen kühlen Ort festlegen
Kühle Orte, verlässliche Angaben · 7 group points · Participatory News
[Beispiel] Einen ausdrücklich fiktiven Versuch dokumentieren
Nachbarschafts-Lerntagebuch · 10 group points · Participatory News
[Beispiel] Eine einfache Lerntagebuch-Vorlage entwerfen
Nachbarschafts-Lerntagebuch · 10 group points · Participatory News
[Beispiel] Fünf Fragen für eine ehrliche Lösungsgeschichte sammeln
Was funktioniert – und warum? · 7 group points · Participatory News
Kurze Brainstorming-Runde: Was fehlt aktuell in euren lokalen News?
Wie soll die Zukunft der Lokalnachrichten aussehen? · 3 group points · Participatory News
Quickly identify one public space in your area that feels welcoming for listening
Öffentliche Räume zum Zuhören · 5 group points · Mitmacht 2026
Rules
Everything Enso is told, open to read, and what the machine used for it. Say whether it fits.
Read the rulesGroups at work91
- Demokratie verständlich machen
7 group points · Participatory News
- Vom lokalen Beschluss zur verständlichen Entscheidungskarte
7 group points · Participatory News
- Reparieren und Wissen teilen
4 group points · Utopia
- Die ruhige Stadtteil-Woche
4 group points · Participatory News
- Quellen verstehen, Fragen klären
10 group points · Participatory News
- Eine Quellenkarte, die weiterhilft
10 group points · Participatory News
6 of 91 groups
Open all groupsChannels
Following needs joining. Join Sending by email is not there yet.
Mitmacht 2026Venue
Global NewsVenue
Tech & natureVenue